~/ learn/ afm-111/ cards/ Feedback and the Kritik cycle
1 of 6

A student describes Kritik as "calibrate, then create, then evaluate, then feedback". A classmate corrects them. Which correction is right?

A student describes Kritik as "calibrate, then create, then evaluate, then feedback". A classmate corrects them. Which correction is right?

Answer

Calibration is separate; the stages are create, evaluate, feedback

Options - A. Calibration is separate; the stages are create, evaluate, feedback - B. Feedback comes before evaluate, because you rate the rubric before grading anyone - C. Create is optional; the marks come only from evaluating peers - D. There is a fifth stage in which the instructor overrides all peer scores Why - A. Correct — the activity runs create → evaluate → feedback; calibration is its own activity in which you grade instructor-pre-graded samples so your accuracy is measured. - B. You cannot rate the evaluations you received until they exist. Feedback is the last stage, after evaluate. - C. Without a created piece there is nothing for peers to evaluate and nothing for you to rate. Create is the first stage. - D. The instructor pre-grades samples for calibration and can review disputes, but a routine fifth stage is not part of the cycle.

kritik.io calibrated-peer-review explainer (read 2026-09-17); Olds ch 7; Smith 11.1.4; concept map A06, A07

space flip · ← → navigate · esc to exit
NORMAL ~/memra/library/ac292d81-739a-48f6-aa45-507575304448/flashcard utf-8 LF