"Good job, very thorough" as peer feedback:

Answer

Earns a low feedback score — no rubric line, no location, no fix

Options - A. Is encouraging and sufficient — praise is what motivates a peer to improve - B. Earns a low feedback score — no rubric line, no location, no fix - C. Is the calibrate step of the peer-review cycle, done before reviewing peers - D. Is direct feedback done well Why - A. Encouraging, and empty: the receiver cannot act on it and the marker cannot see any judgement in it. - B. Correct — R-feedback's five lines: the rubric line named, the place cited, what would earn it, respectful tone, one thing that worked. This comment has, at best, the last. - C. Calibration is grading a sample against the rubric before reviewing peers. This is not that. - D. Direct means the point first; it does not mean a compliment with no content.

Smith 11.1.4 (constructive criticism); Olds ch 7 (feedback); concept map L03, L07, L08; outline §cases 3; verified-facts F2.3-b (rules 203, 205)