A number that predicts, and a number that confirms
◈ 8 cardsDefine a KPI, classify measures as financial or non-financial and leading or lagging, and evaluate a proposed measure against the six characteristics of a good one.
What a KPI is
A key performance indicator is a measure chosen because it tracks something the strategy depends on — key because a company can watch only a handful of numbers closely, performance because it moves when people act, indicator because it stands for a goal that is larger than itself. Two classifications organise every KPI on the exam.
Financial or non-financial. A financial measure is stated in dollars or derived from the statements: gross margin, revenue growth, ROA. A non-financial measure is a count, a rate or a time: pick accuracy, training hours, complaints per 1,000 orders.
Leading or lagging. A lagging measure confirms a result after it has happened; a leading measure moves first and predicts the result. Financial measures are almost always lagging — ROA for 2025 tells you about 2025 once the year is closed. Non-financial measures tend to lead: a rise in complaints this month predicts the repeat-purchase rate next quarter and the revenue after that. The trap is to assume non-financial means lagging because it is “softer”; it is the reverse.
Eight Tamarack measures, classified
Measure Financial? Leading / lagging
Gross margin % financial lagging
Revenue growth % financial lagging
ROA financial lagging
Warehouse pick accuracy non-fin. leading (→ complaints, returns)
Staff training hours non-fin. leading (→ service quality)
Website load time non-fin. leading (→ online conversion)
Complaints per 1,000 orders non-fin. leading (→ repeat purchases)
Net promoter score non-fin. leading (→ revenue growth)
The six characteristics of a good measure
Not every measurable thing is worth measuring. A good KPI is:
- Aligned with the strategy — it moves when the strategy is working.
- Controllable by the person judged on it — they can move it by what they do.
- Timely — available soon enough to act on.
- Reliable and verifiable — two people measuring it get the same number.
- Cost-effective to collect — the data is worth more than the cost of gathering it.
- Hard to game — the easiest way to improve the number is to do the job well.
Testing “sales per employee”
Tamarack proposes to pay store managers a bonus on sales per employee. Run it through the six. Aligned? Partly — it rewards revenue, but says nothing about the fitting and service the strategy rests on. Controllable? A manager controls staffing and, less directly, sales. Timely? Monthly, yes. Reliable? Yes, both numbers come from the systems. Cost-effective? Free. Hard to game? No. The fastest way to raise sales per employee is to cut part-time staff: the numerator barely moves in the short run and the denominator falls at once. The store gets emptier, the fittings get shorter, the repeat rate falls — and the KPI reports success while the strategy fails. The measure is also lagging and financial only. The fix is a pairing: sales per employee and a customer-satisfaction floor, or contribution per store, so that gaming one number costs the other.
The habit to build is the sixth characteristic as a question: how would I game this? Ask it before adopting any measure, because a measure changes behaviour whether or not you intended it to.